Hey Willie, a fellow startup guy here.
I bought my bike to get around the bay area. Given the same sort of schedule you have (60 hour weeks, and the 6 mile run most days, two 25-30 mile rides each week), wasting time driving isn't really an option, and with lane splitting, you can cut time on the road by two thirds being on a bike. So for the first 4 months, it was almost entirely short rides of 3 or 4 miles each day with a few 15 mile rides a week.
Once that project ended, I came back home to Seattle, and rode the long way home via Sequoia Nat'l park, gold country, across Carson pass into Nevada, etc, etc. 5 days, 2200 miles.
Since returning, it gets ridden any time I don't need extra carrying capacity. Cargo is about the only limiting factor, but presentability is the other, albeit less frequent reason not to ride. It's hard to keep a nice suit and tie looking good on a lightning after 20 miles of riding in freeway traffic in the rain.
Not a single bike night, no bar hopping at all, but plenty of 400-500 mile day trips through the North Cascades, out on the Peninsula, or through the Okanagans.
Besides the fact that it is just a lot of fun to ride, I find riding the Buell to be really rewarding and I imagine it is so for anybody who enjoys and actively pursues skills acquisition and mastery, and also indulges regularly in spontaneous play. One thing I've grown to love and appreciate about the lightning is that wherever I happen to be on any given learning curve, the bike always has the ability to offer more room to grow. From my experience with bikes, that's a really unique characteristic. In the past, I've found mostly extremes--extremely safe, reliable, boring bikes, and on the other end, those that are high performance but with a very narrow "fun" envelope.